🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic discussions with the United States on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed new appeals had been made by intermediaries to resume talks with the US government. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is navigating a difficult course since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president claiming the sites had been eliminated. Following this, Western states exercised their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that American atomic experts could function inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the deal to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if discussions reopen.

The American leader recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be ended by military means. He asserted the attacks started with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and ended with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making confidence challenging to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly tried to dictate their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and remains the ultimate solution to resolve conflicts, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be adhered to."

"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned many lessons from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the government and the state in the face of this assault."